modeling101

Monday, August 15, 2005

MRSA FACTS FOR YOUR CHILDREN/ SCHOOLS

METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS
GENERAL INFORMATION:
What is it?
Methicillin (meth-uh-SILL-un) resistant Staphylococcus (staf-ih-loh-KOK-us) aureus (OR-e-us) is a bacteria (bak-TEER-e-uh) (germ) that causes bad infections. It is also called MRSA. MRSA is part of a growing number of bacteria that have mutated (changed) over the years. This bacteria cannot be killed by many different kinds of antibiotic (an-ti-bi-AH-tik) medicines. This bacteria can infect any part of your body. MRSA is a major health concern for caregivers. It is hard to treat, and it is very contagious (kun-TAY-jus) (easy to spread). MRSA used to be an infection you only got in the hospital. Now more people are getting MRSA outside of the hospital.
Many healthy people, including caregivers, have staph bacteria in or on their bodies and they do not know it. Staph bacteria is commonly found on the skin and in the nose. You may have MRSA and not know it. You may not be sick or have any signs or symptoms of infection. This is called colonization (kol-ih-nih-ZAY-shun). When you are colonized with MRSA, you can give it to other people and make them sick.
What causes it? MRSA is caused by bacteria that have mutated. They can no longer be killed by many antibiotics. It is also caused by caregivers giving you antibiotic medicine to treat an illness when you may not need an antibiotic. Many people do not follow their caregivers instructions when they take an antibiotic. Antibiotic medicine must be taken as ordered until the last one is gone, even if you feel better. By stopping your antibiotic before your caregiver tells you to, you allow bacteria to become resistant to that antibiotic. This is why many antibiotics cannot kill MRSA.

Who gets MRSA? Anyone can get MRSA, even if they have not been sick or in the hospital. You are at higher risk of getting MRSA if you:
Have been on a lot of antibiotics, or have not taken your antibiotics as instructed by your caregiver.
Have taken antibiotics for a viral illness. Illnesses caused by a virus include the common cold, the flu, and most sore throats. A virus is a type of germ that cannot be killed by antibiotics.
Have recently been in the hospital or had surgery.
Have been in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Have been in close contact with someone who has MRSA.
Live in a long term care facility or are an older (elderly) adult.
Are a dialysis (di-AL-ih-sis) or diabetic (di-uh-BEH-tik) patient.
Have any tubes going into your body
Have any hardware (metal implants) in your body. Hardware may include artificial (ar-tih-FISH-ull) (fake) joints, a pacemaker, or screws and plates to hold a bone in place.
Be Aware in Gyms , Health Clubs, Sporting Teams , Sports Equipment

How do I know if I have MRSA?
If your antibiotic is not getting rid of your infection, you may not be on the right antibiotic. Your caregiver may need to change your antibiotic. There is also a small chance that you may have MRSA. One of the ways you can get a MRSA infection is if you have a cut in your skin. This allows MRSA to get into your body.
The only way to know if you have MRSA is for your caregiver to do a culture. During this test your caregiver will collect drainage or tissue from your infected area. Your caregiver may also draw blood to see if MRSA is in your bloodstream. The results will tell your caregiver whether you have MRSA. Having a MRSA infection can cause:
Chest pain or heart palpitations (pal-pih-TAY-shuns) (when your heart skips beats). You may also have shortness of breath.
Red, warm skin around the infected area.
Fatigue (being very tired) or not having any energy.
Fever.
Nausea (upset stomach) or vomiting (throwing up).
Pain around the infected site.
Swelling or drainage at the infected site.

How do I keep from getting MRSA?
Your caregiver should not give you antibiotics for illnesses caused by a virus. You may feel that you need antibiotics in order to get well. This is not true. Antibiotics cannot treat or cure viral infections. By taking antibiotics for these conditions, bacteria are allowed to mutate. This may make them unable to be killed by the antibiotics we use now. If bacteria continue to mutate, there may be no antibiotics left to treat infections. Viral conditions usually will go away in time without the need for antibiotics.
If you do have a bacterial infection, and you are given antibiotics, take them as instructed by your caregiver. Keep taking them until the last one is gone, even if you feel better. By stopping your antibiotic before your caregiver tells you to, you allow bacteria to form resistance to that antibiotic.
Keep any cuts that you have clean and covered with a bandage until the cuts are healed. Follow your caregivers instructions for keeping your cut clean and covered.
It is important that you wash your hands very well. Wash your hands after you use the bathroom, before you touch food, and after you sneeze or cough. Always wash your hands when they are dirty. This will help prevent MRSA from being spread to others. Family and friends should also wash their hands often.
To wash your hands, you should use soap and warm water. Wet your hands under clean, running water. Make a good lather with the soap. Rub your hands back and forth and over each other, applying pressure when you do this. Do this for 15 to 20 seconds. Rinse off all the soap and dry your hands right away.
If you do not have clean, running water available, you may use a germ-killing hand cleaner. Apply some of the cleaner to the palm of one hand. Rub your hands together making sure you cover all areas of your hands. Do this until your hands are dry.

How is MRSA treated? Your caregiver will have you start taking the antibiotic that your MRSA responds best to. The culture test results will help your caregiver make this decision. You may need to be on one or more antibiotics for several weeks. You may also need to be in the hospital for many weeks until your infection is gone. Other things your caregiver may do to treat your MRSA infection include:
Fluid drainage. Draining fluid or pus that has collected in the area of a wound. This fluid makes your pain and infection worse. Your caregiver will numb the area and make a small incision (cut). Depending on how much fluid is in the infected area, your caregiver may decide to leave the area open. This allows for fluid to drain freely and for your caregiver to make sure the antibiotics are working. As your infection goes away, the open area will close and heal on its own.
Surgery. Depending on how bad your infection is, your caregiver may need to do surgery. If you have any hardware in your body, the hardware may be causing your infection. Your caregiver will decide if your hardware needs to be removed. Ask your caregiver if you have any questions or concerns about having surgery.
Contact precautions. As long as you are in the hospital with MRSA, you will be on special precautions called "contact precautions". This means that any caregiver entering your room will wear gloves, a gown, and a mask. This is to protect them from getting and spreading MRSA. You will be put into a private room. You may also be put into a room with another patient that has MRSA. While in a private room, you will be allowed to have visitors. Your visitors will need to wear gloves and gowns.
Other safety measures. MRSA may live on many objects. If someone touches these objects, they may get MRSA and give it to others. To decrease the risk to others of getting MRSA, caregivers may leave equipment in your room. This equipment may include a stethoscope, thermometer, blood pressure cuff, and tape. These items will not be used on anyone else.

How long will I be sick with MRSA? Depending on how bad your MRSA infection is, you may be sick for a very long time. You may need to be on one or more antibiotics for several weeks, even if you feel better. It is very important that your caregiver make sure the MRSA is completely gone before stopping your treatment.
How do I prevent spreading MRSA to others? It is very important that you wash your hands very well. Wash your hands after you use the bathroom, before you touch food, and after you cough or sneeze. Always wash your hands when they are dirty. Keep any cuts that you have clean and covered with a bandage until the cuts are healed. Follow your caregivers instructions for keeping your cut clean and covered. This will help prevent MRSA from being spread to others. Family and friends should also wash their hands often



http://www.healthtouch.comAll pages Copyright© 1995-2005 by Cardinal ScriptNet

Thursday, July 14, 2005

THEY WANT TO BAN OUR VITAMINS !!!

http://www.healthfreedomrights.com/ She has enough on her webpage to bring you up to speed quickly so you will know what to say to your Representative. We ALL have to do this... not only do we have to CALL our representatives... we have to WRITE them... letter after letter... mail many at one time...

THEY WANT TO BAN OUR VITAMINS !!!

Wednesday, July 13, 2005

NO TO MENTAL HEALTH SCREENING !

NO TO MENTAL HEALTH SCREENING !



Family Advocate Opposes Illinois' Plan for Mandatory Mental Health Screening
By Jim BrownJuly 12, 2005
(AgapePress) - An Illinois pro-family activist is urging parents to find out what stage their state is at in implementing President Bush's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health -- and to strongly oppose the plan.
On June 30, Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich received a final proposal from the Illinois Children's Mental Health Partnership. Two years ago, the state Legislature charged the Partnership with crafting a plan to reform Illinois' mental health system. The plan calls for the screening of all Illinois children ages zero to 18 and pregnant women for mental health problems.
However, privacy advocates like Karen Hayes with Concerned Women for America of Illinois feel local public schools should not be performing psychiatric evaluations of students without informed parental consent. Often, says Hayes, parents are not aware their children are being screened.
"There's a real high risk of misdiagnosis [by the schools]," Hayes cautions, adding her concern about a "very definite link" between the testing and some drug companies. "We found in other states that the drug companies were actually funding some of the task forces because there are all these psychotropic drugs on the market that are being promoted," she says -- and many of those drugs, her group points out, have only been approved for and tested on adults.
Hayes contends that with the president's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, the door has been opened for groups like "TeenScreen" -- a supposed suicide prevention program designed by pharmaceutical industry-backed officials at Columbia University. She explains:
"What can take place is that a note is sent home saying [the school is] going to be doing this screening," she says. "And if there is no objection that comes back after the children are handed a note to take home -- and you know most notes end up left in backpacks ... then the school believes that they have parental consent to go ahead with the screening." Concerned Women for America of Illinois has suggested to the state that it institute an "opt in" format for parents, instead of this passive "opt out" plan.
According to Hayes, the Illinois screening program is not about mental health, but rather government control of attitudes and beliefs. In her estimation, she says, the expansion of government in schools and daycares can be both intrusive and costly.
Jim Brown, a regular contributor to AgapePress, is a reporter for American Family Radio News, which can be heard online.
© 2005 AgapePress all rights reserved. tag below this comment. -->
E-mail this page to a friend Printer-Friendly Version Read all of our current headlines
For AgapePress information contact: mailto:editor@agapepress.org
Please Support our Underwriters:

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Baby Charlotte

But Charlotte hasn't given up, and we won't either. SHE NEEDS OUR HELP!Background Information For Bloggers and Blog Readers:Charlotte in the MSMCharlotte's Photo AlbumBaby 'should be allowed to die'BBC News--04/20/05Life-or-death day for baby CharlotteThe Times--04/17/05 Charlotte in the BlogosphereCharlotte WyattUK Commentators--04/19/05Baby Charlotte to Get Ventilator Verdict This Week?MediaCulpa Blog--04/19/05Life Or Death Decisions This WeekSlobokan's Site O' Schtuff--04/17/05 Cross posted at HyscienceandPro Life BlogsandBlogs For Terri
ALERT MEDIA:
Rush@EIBNet.com, kherman@statesman.com, 19Latest@daily.misleader.org, greenpartyusa@igc.org, pjnyden@wvgazette.com, ellengoodman@globe.com, shadowland@newsweek.com, news@reedbusiness.com, MyWord@FoxNews.com, REvans@mercurynews.com, JHubner@Mercurynews.com, prez@usa-exile.org, Malibunews@malibutimes.com, Margolis@foreigncorrespondent.com, FNS@FoxNews.com, Beltway@FoxNews.com, Hannity@FoxNews.com, Colmes@FoxNews.com, alan@alan.com, jim.mills@foxnews.com, Newswatch@FoxNews.com, Oreilly@FoxNews.com, Special@Foxnews.com, latenight@nbc.com, tdp@nt.net, Newswatch@foxnews.com, letters@nypost.com, Moneyline@CNN.com, cushman@nytimes.com, abramsreport@msnbc.com, Hardball@MSNBC.com, evening@cbsnews.com, weekends@cbsnews.com, Questions@MSNBC.com, Joe@msnbc.com, Imus@MSNBC.com, Question@msnbc.com, Nightly@NBC.com, MTP@NBC.com, Crossfire@cnn.com, Wolf@CNN.com, CapReport@cnbc.com, Reliable@cnn.com, newsroom@bergen.com, Jeff.newsstand@cnn.com, Rwallace@herald.com, Arobinson@herald.com, babingtonc@washpost.com, newhnews@ncia.net, Letters@prospect.org, letters@cmonitor.com, inquirer.letters@phillynews.com, letters@detnews.com, DYJackson@tribune.com, ddefenoyl@globeandmail.ca, valley@latimes.com, business@latimes.com, ventura@latimes.com, metrodesk@latimes.com, news-tips@nytimes.com, the-arts@nytimes.com, bizday@nytimes.com, metro@nytimes.com, national@nytimes.com, washington@nytimes.com, online.editor@thetimes.co.uk, rcribb@thestar.ca, foreign.news@thetimes.co.uk, dbrazao@thestar.ca, ldiebel@thestar.ca, 2020@abc.com, thisweek@abc.com, nightline@abcnews.com , mike@mikemalloy.com, rrhodes@airamericaradio.com, info@alternativeradio.org , info@alternet.org, talk2us@americasblackforum.com, feedback@ap.org, msilverman@ap.org, rfournier@ap.org, hunt@ap.org, bsenftleber@ajc.com, bsteiden@ajc.com, hklibanoff@ajc.com, rnarayanan@ajc.com, atrios@comcast.net, newsonline@bbc.co.uk, anita@mindgallery.com, jfetzer@d.umn.edu, hprzybyla@bloomberg.net, hrosenkrantz@bloomberg.net, ombud@globe.com, kcooper@globe.com, oliphant@globe.com, brelis@globe.com, lettersbwol@businessweek.com, richard_dunham@businessweek.com, buzzflash@buzzflash.com, query@cambridgeforum.org, 48hours@cbsnews.com, 60m@cbsnews.com, bpc@cbsnews.com, ftn@cbsnews.com, sundays@cbsnews.com, grain@cbsnews.com, aweathersbee@suntimes.com, cledbetter@suntimes.com, showcase@suntimes.com, jcruickshank@suntimes.com, sneed@suntimes.com, ddouglas@suntimes.com, rkemper@tribune.com, cgarrett@tribune.com, GWashburn@tribune.com, jzeleny@tribune.com, MPossley@tribune.com, jcrewdson@tribune.com, bmccauley@enquirer.com, dhorn@enquirer.com, jborgman@enquirer.com, jloven@ap.org, kcarroll@ap.org, npickler@ap.org, sjohnson@ap.org, cwarmbold@ajc.com, wilsonc@timesrecordnews.com, drudge@drudgereport.com, news@worldnetdaily.com, letters@worldnetdaily.com, Hannity@foxnews.com, Colmes@foxnews.com, me@glennbeck.com
posted by Straight Up with Sherri at 12:22 PM 0 comments

Monday, April 11, 2005

WE Will Never Forget You Terri

And the Verdict on Justice Kennedy Is: Guilty
By Dana Milbank
Saturday, April 9, 2005; Page A03
Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy is a fairly accomplished jurist, but he might want to get himself a good lawyer -- and perhaps a few more bodyguards.
Conservative leaders meeting in Washington yesterday for a discussion of "Remedies to Judicial Tyranny" decided that Kennedy, a Ronald Reagan appointee, should be impeached, or worse.
Phyllis Schlafly, doyenne of American conservatism, said Kennedy's opinion forbidding capital punishment for juveniles "is a good ground of impeachment." To cheers and applause from those gathered at a downtown Marriott for a conference on "Confronting the Judicial War on Faith," Schlafly said that Kennedy had not met the "good behavior" requirement for office and that "Congress ought to talk about impeachment."
Next, Michael P. Farris, chairman of the Home School Legal Defense Association, said Kennedy "should be the poster boy for impeachment" for citing international norms in his opinions. "If our congressmen and senators do not have the courage to impeach and remove from office Justice Kennedy, they ought to be impeached as well."
Not to be outdone, lawyer-author Edwin Vieira told the gathering that Kennedy should be impeached because his philosophy, evidenced in his opinion striking down an anti-sodomy statute, "upholds Marxist, Leninist, satanic principles drawn from foreign law."
Ominously, Vieira continued by saying his "bottom line" for dealing with the Supreme Court comes from Joseph Stalin. "He had a slogan, and it worked very well for him, whenever he ran into difficulty: 'no man, no problem,' " Vieira said.
The full Stalin quote, for those who don't recognize it, is "Death solves all problems: no man, no problem." Presumably, Vieira had in mind something less extreme than Stalin did and was not actually advocating violence. But then, these are scary times for the judiciary. An anti-judge furor may help confirm President Bush's judicial nominees, but it also has the potential to turn ugly.
A judge in Atlanta and the husband and mother of a judge in Chicago were murdered in recent weeks. After federal courts spurned a request from Congress to revisit the Terri Schiavo case, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) said that "the time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior." Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) mused about how a perception that judges are making political decisions could lead people to "engage in violence."
"The people who have been speaking out on this, like Tom DeLay and Senator Cornyn, need to be backed up," Schlafly said to applause yesterday. One worker at the event wore a sticker declaring "Hooray for DeLay."

washington post.com

Saturday, April 09, 2005

Terri and Florida Law

Sher Zieve
Judge Greer’s Decisions: Another LookBy Sher ZieveMichNews.comApr 4, 2005
In an attempt to not be unduly harsh or partisan, in regards to Judge Greer’s handling of and rulings on the Terri Schiavo case, I took another look at Florida State law. As some individuals continue to assert that Judge Greer ‘followed the law to the letter’ and was strictly ‘constructionist’ and ‘conservative’ in his rulings, I thought I might have misinterpreted Florida law as it is written. If I’d made an error in my assessments of the case and in fairness to the honorable judge, it certainly warranted my additional review. I’ve made mistakes before and will, no doubt, make them again! Alas, it strongly appears that I was correct the first, second and third times.
Florida statutes regarding euthanasia (or as our friends to the left of center wish to call it ‘the right to die’) seem relatively clear. Florida statute 765.309: Mercy Killing of Euthanasia Not Authorized; Suicide Distinguished states: 1) “Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to condone, authorize, or approve mercy killing or euthanasia, or to permit any affirmative or deliberate act of omission to end the life other than to permit the natural process of dying”; 2) “The withholding or withdrawal of life-prolonging procedures from a patient in accordance with any provision of this chapter does not, for any purpose, constitute a suicide”. Note: I find the phrase “or to permit any affirmative or deliberate act of omission to end the life other than to permit the natural process of dying” of particular interest and salience. The omission, for Terri Schiavo, was food and water. Barely (or not at all in my opinion) arguable, is that ‘withholding food and water’ constitutes a ‘natural death’.
One of the arguments detractors and pro-euthanasia advocates present is that Terri Schiavo had ‘feeding and hydration tubes’ inserted in her body and those, alone, were ‘sustaining her life artificially’. I strongly disagree with that allegation and interpretation of “artificial”. But, for the moment, let’s assume it is true. Michael Schiavo and Judge Greer also ruled that no one was allowed to give Terri food or water orally. Had she been given sustenance in this “natural” way, Terri would not be dead, today. The evidence that Terri Schiavo was forced to die by the direction of the state is unequivocal. Also, let’s take a look at the phrase “the withholding or withdrawal of life-prolonging procedures from a patient in accordance with any provision of this chapter does not, for any purpose, constitute a suicide”. As we know, Terri’s death was not suicide. Rather, it was ‘death by the hands of another’; her estranged husband and the US court system. Florida law and statute 765.309 was, indeed, violated.
Florida statute 458.326 Intractable Pain; Authorized Treatment: “Nothing in this section shall be construed to condone, authorize, or approve mercy killing or euthanasia, and no treatment authorized by this section may be used for such purpose.” Again, this statute is clear in its refusal to accept, condone or allow euthanasia. Then, there is Florida statute 782.08 Assisting Self-Murder: “Every person deliberately assisting another in the commission of self-murder shall be guilty of manslaughter, a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s.775.082, s. 775.083 or s.775.084.” Seems fairly evident that this law was, also, broken. But, as judges are the ones who ‘interpret the laws’, in order to affect and impose their wills upon a gullible population, they have ‘interpreted’ the laws differently. Note: With the explicit language of Florida statutes, the only way (that seems even remotely plausible) they could have done so was to disregard said laws. Yet, another Florida statute that was deliberately violated? Certainly seems so.
An additional Florida statute, which seems to have been disregarded by the courts, is 744.3215 “Rights of persons determined incapacitated”. I’ve received myriad emails arguing that Terri Schiavo, in her condition, was neither guaranteed nor even allowed an attorney. Well, kids, that’s not what 744.3215 says. In fact, this statute states, amongst other rights afforded to the disabled, that “A person who has been determined to be incapacitated retains the right: (l) to counsel”. That counsel (IE legal counsel) would be in the form of a legal advocate. Terri was denied legal counsel. Another of the guaranteed rights in this Florida statute is (d) “to be treated humanely, with dignity and respect, and to be protected against abuse, neglect, and exploitation”. Suffice it to say, Terri Schiavo was not in any way “protected against abuse, neglect, and exploitation”; unless one considers her killing to actually have been her “protection”. Insanity! Euthanasia is not protection and is, most certainly, exhibiting “abuse, neglect and exploitation”. Murder is one of the most severe forms of abuse.
Then there are the specious declarations that those individuals who signed sworn affidavits, in favor of Terri Schiavo, were “not credible”. Really? Then, why in the world would they have affected them? What did they have to gain? The only thing that three nurses “gained” was to lose their jobs after agreeing to testify against Michael Schiavo. Hmmm. Doesn’t sound like they gained much…or anything. The problem is that whenever the pro-euthanasia/ culture of death folks are challenged, they become agitated and start shrieking one of their mainstay mantras “it’s unconstitutional!”; even when that which is being effected is constitutional. So, the next time one of the death-cultists “double-dog dares you” to provide proof of your arguments on the Schiavo case, just quote them chapter and verse of Florida state law. And, if that doesn’t shut them up, there’s always Amendment XIV to the US Constitution.
Copyright by Sher Zieve
---------------Sher Zieve is a Conservative political commentator who firmly believes that if Leftists ran the country (left to their own devices), it would be the end of the United States as a sovereign nation. Ms. Zieve welcomes your comments and can be reached at earthseed@iwon.com

Thursday, March 31, 2005

GOD BLESS YOU TERRI SCHLINDLER

REST IN PEACE
YOU WILL ALWAYS BE IN MY HEART!